<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diworsification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/diworsification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/diworsification/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog written by Preet Banerjee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Linkstuff - lots and lots and lots o&#8217; links!</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/diworsification/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Linkstuff - lots and lots and lots o&#8217; links!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=743#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>[...] Does All My Money Go had a post on diworsification - don&#8217;t know what that means? Then read the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does All My Money Go had a post on diworsification &#8211; don&#8217;t know what that means? Then read the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Clark</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/diworsification/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=743#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>The classic Canadian example of diworsification is Nortel in the dot come bubble. A lot of investors (myself included) unknowingly diworsified instead of diversified even when owning a broad group of mutual funds, only to find out that because of loose investment mandates (and mutual fund mangers trying to chase performance) they all owned a chunk of Nortel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The classic Canadian example of diworsification is Nortel in the dot come bubble. A lot of investors (myself included) unknowingly diworsified instead of diversified even when owning a broad group of mutual funds, only to find out that because of loose investment mandates (and mutual fund mangers trying to chase performance) they all owned a chunk of Nortel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Fung</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/diworsification/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Fung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=743#comment-2100</guid>
		<description>Great article. I think many people don&#039;t understand the true meaning behind diversification. If one holds a portfolio of pure energy companies, or example, some might consider that they are &#039;diversifying&#039; by investing in different energy companies. When in reality, these companies might be positively correlated. I think a good measurement of how strong one&#039;s portfolio is diversified is by using measurements of correlation. True diversification to me means negative correlation (diff industries, diff size, diff countries)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I think many people don&#8217;t understand the true meaning behind diversification. If one holds a portfolio of pure energy companies, or example, some might consider that they are &#8216;diversifying&#8217; by investing in different energy companies. When in reality, these companies might be positively correlated. I think a good measurement of how strong one&#8217;s portfolio is diversified is by using measurements of correlation. True diversification to me means negative correlation (diff industries, diff size, diff countries)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/diworsification/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=743#comment-2099</guid>
		<description>Good reminder, specially now when there&#039;s some good companies at very reasonable valuations.  Too easy to jump on the proverbial horse and ride off in all directions.  Thanks, Preet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good reminder, specially now when there&#8217;s some good companies at very reasonable valuations.  Too easy to jump on the proverbial horse and ride off in all directions.  Thanks, Preet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preet</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/diworsification/#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>Preet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=743#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>@FT - you are quite right - Lynch did talk about companies expanding beyond their core competencies and called this diworsification. I think that since then the concept of diworsification has become accepted as the process of adding to one&#039;s portfolio to the detriment of the risk/return trade-off (which can apply to a company&#039;s portfolio of assets/business lines or an individual investor&#039;s investment portfolio). I&#039;ll add a note to the post - thanks for the great comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@FT &#8211; you are quite right &#8211; Lynch did talk about companies expanding beyond their core competencies and called this diworsification. I think that since then the concept of diworsification has become accepted as the process of adding to one&#8217;s portfolio to the detriment of the risk/return trade-off (which can apply to a company&#8217;s portfolio of assets/business lines or an individual investor&#8217;s investment portfolio). I&#8217;ll add a note to the post &#8211; thanks for the great comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MillionDollarJourney</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/diworsification/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>MillionDollarJourney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=743#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>Preet, I always thought that Peter Lynch&#039;s &quot;diworsification&quot; meant that when a company expands beyond their area of specialty.  For example, if Exxon Mobile decided to expand into the banking sector.  However, I can also see how it would apply to the individual investor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preet, I always thought that Peter Lynch&#8217;s &#8220;diworsification&#8221; meant that when a company expands beyond their area of specialty.  For example, if Exxon Mobile decided to expand into the banking sector.  However, I can also see how it would apply to the individual investor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

