<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Article: DSC Index Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/guest-article-dsc-index-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/guest-article-dsc-index-funds/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog written by Preet Banerjee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Returns Reaper</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/guest-article-dsc-index-funds/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>Returns Reaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=1669#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>DSC stands for &quot;deferred sales charge&quot;, where you pay nothing upfront when you buy a fund.  But if you sell the fund before a certain time, you pay some kind of penalty.  The penalty usually declines over time until it is free to redeem the fund.  I&#039;m not an advisor so I&#039;m specualting a bit, but I believe the rationale behind this is that it allows the fund to pay the advisor a commission up front, with the knowledge that the fund will either collect &#039;n&#039; years of MERs from you or you will pay an amount to help cover the commission when you sell.

With respect to advisor compensation, I&#039;d simply love it if the compensation was much more obvious.  Whether it be an hourly charge for time spent on your portfolio, or a percentage of assets under management.  Neither system is perfect, but both of them seem to provide a lot less incentive to act against the investor&#039;s best interests.  At least you know what you&#039;re paying for, and these advisors should not sell products with commissions attached.  There are advisors who operate under this model, but they are far from the norm.

I suppose the reason the commissioned model is so popular is that it appears to be free.  If I was an uneducated investor, and I was told I could pay someone 0.5% or 1% of my assets every year for them to manage my money, or I could go to someone else where there is no up front mention of costs out of my pocket, I suppose I&#039;d go with the commissioned sales guy too.  And I&#039;d be willing to bet that for investors that are just starting out, an advisor would have to charge a large percentage annually to make it worth their while.  So there&#039;s even more of an incentive to hide the fees involved.

I guess it&#039;s hard to fault advisors for creating the business model that works best on the majority of consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DSC stands for &#8220;deferred sales charge&#8221;, where you pay nothing upfront when you buy a fund.  But if you sell the fund before a certain time, you pay some kind of penalty.  The penalty usually declines over time until it is free to redeem the fund.  I&#8217;m not an advisor so I&#8217;m specualting a bit, but I believe the rationale behind this is that it allows the fund to pay the advisor a commission up front, with the knowledge that the fund will either collect &#8216;n&#8217; years of MERs from you or you will pay an amount to help cover the commission when you sell.</p>
<p>With respect to advisor compensation, I&#8217;d simply love it if the compensation was much more obvious.  Whether it be an hourly charge for time spent on your portfolio, or a percentage of assets under management.  Neither system is perfect, but both of them seem to provide a lot less incentive to act against the investor&#8217;s best interests.  At least you know what you&#8217;re paying for, and these advisors should not sell products with commissions attached.  There are advisors who operate under this model, but they are far from the norm.</p>
<p>I suppose the reason the commissioned model is so popular is that it appears to be free.  If I was an uneducated investor, and I was told I could pay someone 0.5% or 1% of my assets every year for them to manage my money, or I could go to someone else where there is no up front mention of costs out of my pocket, I suppose I&#8217;d go with the commissioned sales guy too.  And I&#8217;d be willing to bet that for investors that are just starting out, an advisor would have to charge a large percentage annually to make it worth their while.  So there&#8217;s even more of an incentive to hide the fees involved.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s hard to fault advisors for creating the business model that works best on the majority of consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name withheld</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/guest-article-dsc-index-funds/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>Name withheld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=1669#comment-1379</guid>
		<description>Ok, so what does DSC stand for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so what does DSC stand for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

