<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Market Impact And Small Cap Stocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/market-impact-and-small-cap-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/market-impact-and-small-cap-stocks/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog written by Preet Banerjee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Canadian Small Cap ETF Available : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/market-impact-and-small-cap-stocks/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>New Canadian Small Cap ETF Available : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 01:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=911#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>[...] This is one area where CNDA might have an advantage. It looks like CNDA has a higher market capitalization minimum for inclusion &#8211; meaning that companies have to be of a certain size and if they are too small, they are excluded from the index. If there are days when there is a lot of buying or selling pressure on both of these ETFs, CNDA&#8217;s index is less likely to suffer from capacity constraints (meaning that the smallest names won&#8217;t have their prices materially affected by large purchases and sells). For more explanation on &#8220;capacity&#8221; or &#8220;market impact&#8221; click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is one area where CNDA might have an advantage. It looks like CNDA has a higher market capitalization minimum for inclusion &#8211; meaning that companies have to be of a certain size and if they are too small, they are excluded from the index. If there are days when there is a lot of buying or selling pressure on both of these ETFs, CNDA&#8217;s index is less likely to suffer from capacity constraints (meaning that the smallest names won&#8217;t have their prices materially affected by large purchases and sells). For more explanation on &#8220;capacity&#8221; or &#8220;market impact&#8221; click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preet</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/market-impact-and-small-cap-stocks/#comment-2212</link>
		<dc:creator>Preet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=911#comment-2212</guid>
		<description>@Finance: There are only so many buyers/sellers, so if you place a large order you can chew through the bids/asks quite quickly. Lower liquidity stocks with thin market depth will be especially vulnerable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Finance: There are only so many buyers/sellers, so if you place a large order you can chew through the bids/asks quite quickly. Lower liquidity stocks with thin market depth will be especially vulnerable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/market-impact-and-small-cap-stocks/#comment-2211</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=911#comment-2211</guid>
		<description>It seems that the impact of transactions on stock price (market impact) is a function of the size of the order. Any theory that suggests why this is so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the impact of transactions on stock price (market impact) is a function of the size of the order. Any theory that suggests why this is so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preet</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/market-impact-and-small-cap-stocks/#comment-2210</link>
		<dc:creator>Preet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=911#comment-2210</guid>
		<description>@Michael James - Thanks and you make a good point. Further, what is even more interesting is that even with this hurdle he has managed to deliver extraordinary results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael James &#8211; Thanks and you make a good point. Further, what is even more interesting is that even with this hurdle he has managed to deliver extraordinary results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael James</title>
		<link>http://wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/market-impact-and-small-cap-stocks/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheredoesallmymoneygo.com/?p=911#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>Nice explanation of market impact.  This provides background for Warren Buffett&#039;s claim that his universe of potential investments shrinks as his pile of money increases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice explanation of market impact.  This provides background for Warren Buffett&#8217;s claim that his universe of potential investments shrinks as his pile of money increases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

